Advanced Search
LI Yizhe, WANG Dongpo, DENG Caiyan, GONG Baoming, WANG Sheng. Comparasion of methods to determine CTOD from single edge notched specimens[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2017, 38(4): 59-62. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20170414
Citation: LI Yizhe, WANG Dongpo, DENG Caiyan, GONG Baoming, WANG Sheng. Comparasion of methods to determine CTOD from single edge notched specimens[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2017, 38(4): 59-62. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20170414

Comparasion of methods to determine CTOD from single edge notched specimens

More Information
  • Received Date: April 06, 2015
  • The determination of CTOD(crack tip opening displacement) has significantly affected the safety margin of design as well as the service life in enginnering critical assessment.Single edge notched tension(SENT) specimens is considered appropriate for the determination of CTOD in pipelines.There are several calculation methods against CTOD of SENT specimens while no unified standard has been agreed.In this paper,comparasion between various methods and the double-clip method for API X70 steel through SENT experiment is conducted.Evaluation of influece on critical crack size by different calculation methods with Crackwise 4.0 is performed.Compared with the double clip method,other calculation methods for CTOD deviated significantly, and the accuracy of fracture toughness has a great inlfuence on critical crack size of ECA assessment.
  • British Standard Institution. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures[S]. British:British Standard Institution, 2005.
    Paredes M, Ruggieri C. Further results in J and CTOD estimation procedures for SE(T) fracture specimens-part II: weld centerline cracks[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2012, 89: 24-39.
    Chen Y, Lambert S. Analysis of ductile tearing of pipeline-steel in single edge notch tension specimens[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2003, 124(3): 179-199.
    American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness[S]. America:American Society for Testing and Materials, 2013.
    Wallin K. The size effect in K IC results[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1985, 22(1): 149-163.
    Yang J, Z. Wang G, Z. Xuan F, et al. Unified characterisation of in-plane and out-of-plane constraint based on crack-tip equivalent plastic strain[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2013, 36(6): 504-514.
    Hebel J, Hohe J, Friedmann V, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of in-plane and out-of-plane crack tip constraint characterization by secondary fracture parameters[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2007, 146(3): 173-188.
    Sarzosa D F B, Ruggieri C. A numerical investigation of constraint effects in circumferentially cracked pipes and fracture specimens including ductile tearing[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2014, 120(8): 1-18.
    Meshii T, Lu K, Takamura R. A failure criterion to explain the test specimen thickness effect on fracture toughness in the transition temperature region[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 104(15): 184-197.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WEI Wei, MA Minze, ZHANG He, ZHAO Xingming, YANG Xinhua. Construction of the S-N curve evaluation model based on entropy for welded joints[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20240909002
    [2]HU Xin, LI Yanqing, HUANG Jinhao. Discussion on fatigue evaluation models of steel welded joints treated by HFMI[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2022, 43(3): 80-86. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20210703003
    [3]WEI Wei, ZHANG Yuntong, LIU Ke, JIA Xia, YANG Xinhua. Rapid high-cycle fatigue performance evaluation of laser-butt joints based on energy dissipation[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2021, 42(12): 48-53. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20210607001
    [4]WEI Wei, SUN Yibo, YANG Guang, SUN Yang, YANG Xinhua. Fatigue strength evaluation of Q460 weld joints based on energy dissipation[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2021, 42(4): 49-55. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20200907001
    [5]DU Yongpeng, GUO Ning, WU Chenghao, HUANG Lu, ZHANG Xin, FENG Jicai. Study on the application of the weld reinforcement variation coefficient in underwater wet welding quality evaluation[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2020, 41(2): 24-27, 32. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20190917001
    [6]CHANG Junjie, LI Yuanyuan, HU Chen, Wu Ruifeng. Quality evaluation of laser welds based on air-coupled ultrasound[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2019, 40(10): 60-66. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2019400264
    [7]LI Xiangwei, ZHAO Wenzhong, ZHENG Chengde. Weld fatigue life assessment based on fuzzy quality evaluation model[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2010, (8): 49-52.
    [8]ZHANG Hongjie, HOU Yanyan. Quality evaluation of the resistance spot welding based on PCASVM[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2009, (4): 97-100.
    [9]LUO Xian-xing, DENG Li-peng, ZHANG Chen-shu, JI Chun-tao. Evaluation of nugget size and characteristics of influencing factors in resistance spot welding of aluminum[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2005, (7): 37-43.
    [10]CHU Jian-ying, CHEN Li-gong, NI Chun-zhen. Comparison of several methods for evaluating effectiveness of vibration stress relief process[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2003, (1): 57-60.

Catalog

    Article views (496) PDF downloads (351) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return