Advanced Search
LI Yizhe, WANG Dongpo, DENG Caiyan, GONG Baoming, WANG Sheng. Comparasion of methods to determine CTOD from single edge notched specimens[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2017, 38(4): 59-62. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20170414
Citation: LI Yizhe, WANG Dongpo, DENG Caiyan, GONG Baoming, WANG Sheng. Comparasion of methods to determine CTOD from single edge notched specimens[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2017, 38(4): 59-62. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20170414
shu

Comparasion of methods to determine CTOD from single edge notched specimens

  • 1.

    School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

  • 2.

    Shenzhen Chiwan Wins Treasure Prosperous Engineering Co., LTD, Shenzhen 518000, China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 06, 2015
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The determination of CTOD(crack tip opening displacement) has significantly affected the safety margin of design as well as the service life in enginnering critical assessment.Single edge notched tension(SENT) specimens is considered appropriate for the determination of CTOD in pipelines.There are several calculation methods against CTOD of SENT specimens while no unified standard has been agreed.In this paper,comparasion between various methods and the double-clip method for API X70 steel through SENT experiment is conducted.Evaluation of influece on critical crack size by different calculation methods with Crackwise 4.0 is performed.Compared with the double clip method,other calculation methods for CTOD deviated significantly, and the accuracy of fracture toughness has a great inlfuence on critical crack size of ECA assessment.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (9)
  • British Standard Institution. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures[S]. British:British Standard Institution, 2005.
    Paredes M, Ruggieri C. Further results in J and CTOD estimation procedures for SE(T) fracture specimens-part II: weld centerline cracks[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2012, 89: 24-39.
    Chen Y, Lambert S. Analysis of ductile tearing of pipeline-steel in single edge notch tension specimens[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2003, 124(3): 179-199.
    American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness[S]. America:American Society for Testing and Materials, 2013.
    Wallin K. The size effect in K IC results[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1985, 22(1): 149-163.
    Yang J, Z. Wang G, Z. Xuan F, et al. Unified characterisation of in-plane and out-of-plane constraint based on crack-tip equivalent plastic strain[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2013, 36(6): 504-514.
    Hebel J, Hohe J, Friedmann V, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of in-plane and out-of-plane crack tip constraint characterization by secondary fracture parameters[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2007, 146(3): 173-188.
    Sarzosa D F B, Ruggieri C. A numerical investigation of constraint effects in circumferentially cracked pipes and fracture specimens including ductile tearing[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2014, 120(8): 1-18.
    Meshii T, Lu K, Takamura R. A failure criterion to explain the test specimen thickness effect on fracture toughness in the transition temperature region[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 104(15): 184-197.
    • Related Articles

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (487) PDF downloads (350) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    Website Copyright © Editorial Office of Transactions of the China Welding Institution, Welding Journals Publishing HouseTel：0451-86323218Address：No. 2077, Chuangxin Road, Songbei District, Harbin

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return