Citation: | LI Yan, YANG Dezhi, WANG Guicheng, LI Jucai, LIU Cuirong. Structure simulation and optimization of magnetic pulse welding fieldshaper for tube welding[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2025, 46(1): 103-111. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20231025002 |
This article uses finite element simulation to study the working principle of the fieldshaper. It analyzes the magnitude and waveform of the coil current discharged in MPW, the distribution of magnetic field and electromagnetic force during the welding process, the structural strength of the fieldshaper and the size of the Al tube electromagnetic diameter reduction are compared. The results demonstrate that the fieldshaper utilizes the height difference between the inner and outer sides of the structure to facilitate the flow of induced current from the larger outer surface to the smaller inner surface, thereby achieving the convergence of induced current. The improvement of magnetic field distribution by the fieldshaper is positively correlated with the inclination angle α of its inclined wall, the performance of the vertical fieldshaper is higher than that of the conventional fieldshaper and lower than that of the curved fieldshaper. The shape of the cross-section also has a certain effect on its performance, curved fieldshaper structure with the α angle equal to 0 has the best performance, with a 12% increase in the magnitude of magnetic induction intensity in the welded region and a 24.9% higher deformation of the Al tube electromagnetic diameter reduction compared to the conventional fieldshaper, which is more commonly used today. The three types of fieldshaper have small differences in structural strength, all of which can ensure the stability of welding. This paper can provide a certain reference for the design of the fieldshaper structure.
[1] |
王卫东, 秦钢林, 邢淑清, 等. 316L不锈钢与紫铜磁脉冲焊接组织性能分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2017, 38(10): 85 − 88. doi: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20151205001
Wang Weidong, Qin Ganglin, Xing Shuqing, et al. Analysis of the micro-structure and properties of 316L stainless steel and copper magnetic pulse welding[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2017, 38(10): 85 − 88. doi: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20151205001
|
[2] |
Deng F X, Cao Q L, Han X T, et al. Principle and realization of an electromagnetic pulse welding system with a dual-stage coil[J]. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 2018, 57(4): 389 − 398. doi: 10.3233/JAE-180006
|
[3] |
Zhang Y, Babu S S, Prothe C, et al. Application of high velocity impact welding at varied different length scales[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2011, 211(5): 944 − 952. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.001
|
[4] |
Yu H P, Jiang X, Zhang M F. An innovative coil for magnetic pulse welding of dissimilar sheet metals: numerical simulation and experiments[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2024, 324: 118230. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.118230
|
[5] |
Yao Y H, Chen D D, Tang B W, et al. Miniaturized S-shaped flexible magnetic pulse welding coil design for engineering applications[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2023, 104: 372 − 383. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.09.026
|
[6] |
Cui J J, Sun G G, Xu J R, et al. A study on the critical wall thickness of the inner tube for magnetic pulse welding of tubular Al-Fe parts[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2016, 227: 138 − 146. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.08.008
|
[7] |
Yu H P, Li C F, Zhao Z H, et al. Effect of field shaper on magnetic pressure in electromagnetic forming[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005, 168(2): 245 − 249. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.01.001
|
[8] |
Zhang P, Kimchi M, Shao H, et al. Analysis of the electromagnetic impulse joining process with a field concentrator[C]// The 8th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, June 13-17, 2004, Columbus, Ohio. USA. New York: AIP Publishing, 2004.
|
[9] |
Yan Z Q, Xiao A, Cui X H, et al. Magnetic pulse welding of aluminum to steel tubes using a field-shaper with multiple seams[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2021, 65: 214 − 227. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.037
|
[10] |
Kumar R, Kore S D. Experimental studies on the effect of different field shaper geometries on magnetic pulse crimping in cylindrical configuration[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 105(11): 4677 − 4690. doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-04555-8
|
[11] |
Bembalge O B, Singh B, Panigrahi S K. Magnetic pulse welding of AA6061 and AISI 1020 steel tubes: numerical and experimental investigation[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2023, 101: 128 − 140. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.05.098
|
[12] |
Shotri R, Faes K, De A. Magnetic pulse welding of copper to steel tubes-experimental investigation and process modelling[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2020, 58: 249 − 258.
|
[13] |
Li J H, Raoelison R N, Sapanathan T, et al. Determining the weldability window based on the interface morphologies formed during high-speed collision in magnetic pulse welding[J]. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 2022, 28(4): 259 − 267.
|
[14] |
袁嘉欣, 邵飞, 白林越, 等. 基于试验和数值模拟的TC1/1060/6061爆炸焊接复合板界面分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2023, 44(9): 81 − 87. doi: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20221020002
Yuan Jiaxin, Shao Fei, Bao Linyue, et al. Research on the interface of composite plate via explosive welding TC1/1060/6061 based on experiments and numerical simulations[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2023, 44(9): 81 − 87. doi: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20221020002
|
[15] |
Li Z, Peng W X, Chen, Y Z, et al. Simulation and experimental analysis of Al/Ti plate magnetic pulse welding based on multi-seams coil[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022, 83: 290 − 299. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.09.015
|
[1] | XU Nan, XU Yuzhui, GAO Tianxu, SONG Qining, BAO Yefeng. The influence of welding thermal cycle on the grain structure of friction stir welded 5083 aluminum alloy joint[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20240315001 |
[2] | XIAO Wenbo, HE Yinshui, YUAN Haitao, MA Guohong. Synchronous real-time detection of weld bead geometry and the welding torch in galvanized steel GAMW[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2021, 42(12): 78-82. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20201021001 |
[3] | CUI Bing1,2, PENG Yun2, PENG Mengdu2, AN Tongbang2. Effects of weld thermal cycle on microstructure and properties of heataffected zone of Q890 processed steel[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2017, 38(7): 35-39. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20150427004 |
[4] | LIU Haodong, HU Fangyou, CUI Aiyong, LI Hongbo, HUANG Fei. Experimental on thermal cycle of laser welding with ultrasonic processing across different phases[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2015, 36(8): 13-17. |
[5] | LÜ Xiaochun, HE Peng, QIN Jian, DU Bing, HU Zhongquan. Effect of welding thermal cycle on microstructure and properties of intercritically reheated coarse grained heat affected zone in SA508-3 steel[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2014, 35(12): 47-49. |
[6] | WU Dong, LU Shanping, LI Dianzhong. Effect of welding thermal cycle on high temperature mechanical property of Ni-Fe base superalloy[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2014, 35(9): 69-72. |
[7] | HU Yanhua, CHEN Furong, XIE Ruijun, LI Haitao. Designment of test program system for welding thermal cycle in weld zone[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2010, (5): 93-96. |
[8] | HU Yanhua, CHEN Furong, XIE Ruijun, LI Haitao. In-situ detection of weld metal thermal cycle of 10CrMo910 steel[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2009, (10): 105-107. |
[9] | CHEN Yu-hua, WANG Yong. Numerical simulation of thermal cycle of in-service welding onto active pipeline based on SYSWELD[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2007, (1): 85-88. |
[10] | YAO Shang-wei, ZHAO Lu-yu, XU Ke, WANG Ren-fu. Effect of welding thermal cycle on toughness of continuous cast-ing steel center[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2006, (10): 97-100. |
1. |
温淳杰,姚屏,范谨锐,曾祥坤,喻小燕,武威. 316L不锈钢和镍基合金梯度材料MIG焊电弧增材制造工艺研究. 精密成形工程. 2024(10): 208-216 .
![]() |