Advanced Search
SI Xiaoqing, SU Yi, LI Chun, QI Junlei, CAO Jian. Reactive air brazing of BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.1Yb0.1O3-δ proton conductive ceramic and stainless steel[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2022, 43(11): 8-14. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20220706003
Citation: SI Xiaoqing, SU Yi, LI Chun, QI Junlei, CAO Jian. Reactive air brazing of BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.1Yb0.1O3-δ proton conductive ceramic and stainless steel[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2022, 43(11): 8-14. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20220706003

Reactive air brazing of BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.1Yb0.1O3-δ proton conductive ceramic and stainless steel

More Information
  • Received Date: July 05, 2022
  • Available Online: October 12, 2022
  • In this study, the joining problem between the BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.1Yb0.1O3-δ (BCZYYb) ceramic and Crofer 22 APU stainless steel in the protonic ceramic fuel cell stack was studied. The wettability of Ag-CuO braze on the surface of BCZYYb ceramic was explored. And the driving effect of the reactions between CuO and ceramic matrix on braze wetting was analyzed. The reactive air brazing process of Ag-CuO braze was studied, and the BCZYYb ceramic was soundly brazed to the stainless steel at 1010 ℃ for 20 min. The interfacial joining properties on both sides and the element distribution of joints were analyzed. It is showed that the wetting of Ag-CuO braze was promoted by the reactions between the CuO and BaO in the ceramic matrix. The braze could diffuse into the ceramic matrix, forming a thick fusion layer. The densification of the (Mn, Co)3O4 protective layer on the stainless steel could be densified by its reactions with the CuO from the braze, which played a key role in protecting the stainless steel from oxidization during reactive air brazing. Effects of CuO content on the microstructure and properties of joints were analyzed systematically. The highest shear strength of joints (21.6 MPa) was obtained by using Ag-2wt%CuO braze.
  • Bian W J, Wang B M, Tang W, et al. Revitalizing interface in protonic ceramic cells by acid etch[J]. Nature, 2022, 604: 479 − 485.
    Duan C, Tong J, Shang M. et al. Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low-temperatures[J]. Science, 2015, 349: 1321 − 1326. doi: 10.1126/science.aab3987
    Duan C, Kee R J, Zhu H, et al. Highly durable, coking and sulfur tolerant, fuel-flexible protonic ceramic fuel cell[J]. Nature, 2018, 557: 217 − 222. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0082-6
    Le L Q, Hernandez C H, Rodriguez M H, et al. Proton- conducting ceramic fuel cells: Scale up and stack integration[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2021, 482: 228868. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228868
    Kaletsch A, Pfaff E M, Broeckmann C. Effect of aging on microstructure and mechanical strength of reactive air brazed BSCF/AISI 314-joints[J]. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2014, 16: 1430 − 1436. doi: 10.1002/adem.201400102
    Fabbri E, Bi L, Pergolesi D, et al. Towards the next generation of solid oxide fuel cells operating below 600 ℃ with chemically stable proton-conducting electrolytes[J]. Advanced Materials, 2012, 24: 195 − 208. doi: 10.1002/adma.201103102
    Lin C K, Lin T W, Wu S H, et al. Creep rupture of the joint between a glass-ceramic sealant and lanthanum strontium manganite-coated ferritic stainless steel interconnect for solid oxide fuel cells[J]. Journal of European Ceramic Society, 2018, 38(5): 2417 − 2429. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.01.016
    Chou Y S, Thomsen E C, Williams R T, et al. Compliant alkali silicate sealing glass for solid oxide fuel cell applications: thermal cycle stability and chemical compatibility[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(5): 2709 − 2716. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.020
    Kuhn B, Wetzel F J, Malzbender J, et al. Mechanical performance of reactive-air-brazed (RAB) ceramic/metal joints for solid oxide fuel cells at ambient temperature[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2009, 193(1): 199 − 202. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.117
    司晓庆, 李淳, 郑庆伟, 等. Ag-CuO-Al2O3复合钎料空气反应钎焊SOFC及服役性能[J]. 焊接学报, 2020, 41(5): 1 − 6. doi: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20190907001

    Si Xiaoqing, Li Chun, Zheng Qingwei, et al. Reactive air brazing of SOFC using Ag-CuO-Al2O3 composite braze and the service performance study[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2020, 41(5): 1 − 6. doi: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20190907001
    蒋文春, 张玉财, 关学伟. 平板式SOFC钎焊自适应密封热应力与变形分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2012, 33(11): 55 − 58.

    Jiang Wenchun, Zhang Yucai, Guan Xuewei. Thermal stress and deformation in bonded compliant seal design for planar SOFC[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2012, 33(11): 55 − 58.
    Zhou Q, Bieler T R, Nicholas J D, et al. Transient porous nickel interlayers for improved silver-based solid oxide fuel cell brazes[J]. Acta Materials, 2018, 148: 156 − 162. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.061
    Cao J, Si X Q, Li W J, et al. Reactive air brazing of YSZ- electrolyte and Al2O3-substrate for gas sensor sealing: interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 10683 − 10694. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.105
    Wang X Y, Si X Q, Li C, et al. Joining the BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1 O3-δ electrolyte to AISI 441 interconnect for protonic ceramic fuel cell applications: interfacial microstructure and long-term stability[J]. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2021, 4: 7346 − 7354. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c01491
    苏毅. 用于质子陶瓷燃料电池的不锈钢/BCZY-Yb 电解质空气下连接机理[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2021.

    Su Yi. Research on air brazing of BCZY-Yb ceramic to strainless steel in protonic ceramic fuel cell[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Techonligy, 2021.
    Si X Y, Wang D, Li C, et al. Exploring the role of Mn-Co spinel coating on Crofer 22 APU in adjusting reactions with the Ag based sealant during reactive air brazing[J]. Journal of Materials research and technology, 2022, 16: 608 − 618. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.032
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZENG Kai, SUN Xiaoting, XING Baoying, FENG Yuyang. Process optimization and fracture characteristic analysis of DP780 high strength steel weld-bonding[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2020, 41(4): 77-83. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20191017001
    [2]LI Xiaohong, ZHANG Yanhua, LI Zan, ZHANG Tiancang. Study on phase and texture of TC17(α + β)/TC17(β) linear friction welding joint[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2020, 41(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20190219002
    [3]HUANG Zhichao, SONG Tianci, LAI Jiamei. Fatigue property and failure mechanism of self piercing riveted joints of TA1 titanium alloy[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2019, 40(3): 41-46. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2019400069
    [4]LU Yi, HE Xiaocong, XING Baoying, ZHANG Xianlian. Effect of annealing treatment on the fatigue behavior of titanium alloy self-piecing riveted joints[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2018, 39(3): 124-128. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018380083
    [5]ZHANG Long, ZENG Kai, HE Xiaocong, SUN Xinyu. Comparison of joint performance between spot weld bonding and resistance spot welding of titanium alloy[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2018, 39(1): 55-30. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390013
    [6]SHAO Huakai, WU Aiping, ZOU Guisheng. Study on shear strength and fracture behavior of Cu-Sn system low-temperature TLP bonded joint[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2017, 38(3): 13-16.
    [7]CHEN Zhongyi, MA Yonglin, WANG Wenjun, XING Shuqing, LU Hengchang. Finite element analysis on post-weld heat treatment of heavy-section SA508-3 steel plate for nuclear pressure vessel[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2016, 37(2): 80-84.
    [8]CHEN Liang, LI Wenya, MA Tiejun, MA Caixia. Numerical analysis of linear friction welding process of steel S45C[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2010, (2): 91-94.
    [9]JIN Yuhua, WANG Xijing, LI Changfeng, ZHANG Jie. Study on tensile properties of friction-stir-welded joints of 2024-M aluminum alloy[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2009, (4): 69-72.
    [10]ZHAO Zude, SHU Dayu, HUANG Jihua, HU Chuankai, KANG Feng. Strength and fracture character of SiCp/2009Al joint by composites reaction diffusion bonging with Al-Ag-Cu-Ti[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2008, (11): 100-104.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 陈琪,谢志雄,董仕节,解剑英. 高频感应焊TA2钛管焊后退火组织与性能研究. 湖北工业大学学报. 2024(01): 75-79 .
    2. 杜随更,刘冠翔,陈虎,胡弘毅,李菊. TC17(α+β)/TC17(β)线性摩擦焊接过程中焊合区组织及其织构演变. 机械工程学报. 2024(02): 99-106 .
    3. 高山,袁明强. Ti60/TC17异种钛合金惯性摩擦焊接头组织性能研究. 电焊机. 2023(08): 115-121+143 .
    4. 田助新,吴晓峰,杨梦. 焊接表面对线性摩擦焊轴向缩短量的影响. 航空精密制造技术. 2023(05): 33-34+70 .
    5. 杜随更,刘冠翔,李菊. 异质TC17线性摩擦焊接头焊后时效处理组织与性能. 焊接学报. 2022(07): 7-13+113-114 . 本站查看
    6. 金俊龙,李菊,张传臣,常川川. 热处理对TC21钛合金线性摩擦焊接头组织与性能的影响. 焊接学报. 2022(09): 69-74+117 . 本站查看
    7. 马核,李菊,王月,李晓红,张田仓,张彦华. 异态TC17钛合金线性摩擦焊接头微观组织与断裂韧性研究. 航空制造技术. 2022(21): 71-77 .
    8. 刘雷. 线性摩擦焊接摩擦振动伺服系统稳定性分析. 真空. 2021(02): 82-85 .
    9. 李睿,周军,张春波,乌彦全,梁武,秦丰. TC4/Ti17异质钛合金线性摩擦焊接头组织及力学性能. 机械制造文摘(焊接分册). 2021(02): 11-17 .
    10. 余学冉,陈云永. TC17钛合金线性摩擦焊接叶片单元件焊缝设计. 焊接. 2021(03): 26-29+62 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (363) PDF downloads (60) Cited by(16)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return