面阵列封装互连结构热循环翘曲变形抗力
Resistance to warpage deformation of area array packaging interconnect under thermal cyclic load
-
摘要: 借助有限元软件对钎料球、钎料柱和铜柱阵列互连结构热循环载荷下的翘曲变形行为进行研究. 结果表明，三者升温过程均表现为刚度低的树脂基板呈下凹变形、而降温至0 ℃后呈现上凸变形，变形规律相同. 不同温度下两端基板的热膨胀系数差异引发的基板内及相连焊球/焊柱内的应力及力矩是翘曲变形发生的驱动力. 两焊柱阵列互连的基板翘曲位移接近，但均明显低于焊球阵列的基板，翘曲变形抗力更大. –40~125 ℃热循环温度范围及基板尺寸条件下，铜柱未屈服，相对钎料柱阵列互连，未表现铜柱可挠曲变形释放应力的优势.Abstract: The warpage behaviors of solder ball array interconnect, solder column array interconnect and copper column array interconnect structures under thermal cycling load were studied by finite element software. The results show that the warpage deformations of three kinds of area array interconnects is the same, the resin substrates with low stiffness exhibit a concave deformations during the heating stage above room temperature, while the convex deformation occurs after cooling to 0 °C. The stress and torque in the substrates and the ball /column array interconnects caused by the difference of thermal expansion coefficients of both ends substrates at different temperatures are the driving forces of warping. The resin substrates of the solder/copper column array interconnect have similar warpage displacements, but both of them are obviously lower than the substrates of solder ball array interconnect, and the warpage deformation resistance is higher. Under the thermal cycling temperature range from –40 °C to 125 °C and given substrate size condition, the yielding deformation of the copper column has not occurred. Comparison with the solder column array interconnect, the advantage of releasing stress by flexural deformation of the copper column is not exhibit.
-
-
[1] Reza G. CCGA packages for space applications[J]. Micro- Electronics Reliability, 2006, 46: 2006 ? 2024. [2] Nikhil V, Peter R, Valérie E, et al. Environment and usage monitoring of electronic products for health assessment and product design[J]. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management, 2007, 4(2): 235 ? 250. [3] Park S. Comparison of thermo-mechanical behavior of lead-free copper and tin–lead column grid array packages[J]. Microelectronics Reliability, 2008, 48: 763 ? 772. [4] 陈莹磊. 高密度大尺寸 CCGA 二级封装可靠性分析及结构设计[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2010. [5] 肖正香, 薛松柏, 金春玉, 等. CuCGA器件焊点热疲劳行为数值模拟[J]. 焊接学报, 2009, 30(12): 77 ? 81
Xiao Zhengxiang, Xue Songbai, Jin Chunyu, et al. Numerical simulation on thermal fatigue behavior of CuCGA soldered joints[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2009, 30(12): 77 ? 81[6] 赵智力, 徐希锐, 孙凤莲, 等. 铜柱栅阵列互连结构的剪切行为[J]. 焊接学报, 2015, 36(4): 79 ? 82
Zhao Zhili, Xu Xirui, Sun Fenglian, et al. Shear behavior of copper column grid array interconnect structure[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2015, 36(4): 79 ? 82[7] 刘英杰. 铜柱栅阵列互连结构压曲失稳力学行为研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨理工大学, 2017. -
期刊类型引用(11)
1. 庞嘉尧，程伟. 铝合金搅拌摩擦焊接头疲劳性能研究进展. 兵器材料科学与工程. 2025(01): 164-175 . 
百度学术
2. 金玉花，邢逸初，周子正，吴博. 喷丸改性对7050铝合金FSW接头性能的影响. 材料导报. 2023(10): 169-173 . 百度学术
3. 王龙权，周海涛. 7xxx高强铝合金搅拌摩擦焊研究进展. 焊接. 2023(10): 47-54 . 百度学术
4. 周韶泽，郭硕，陈秉智，张军，兆文忠. 焊接结构超高周疲劳主S-N曲线拟合及寿命预测方法. 焊接学报. 2022(05): 76-82+118 . 本站查看
5. 米鹏，王瑞杰，杨庆鹤. 5083铝合金带吻接FSW接头疲劳强度分析. 机械科学与技术. 2021(03): 463-469 . 百度学术
6. 张龙，陈东高，张迎迎，戴宇，马良超，王大锋，郭庆虎，何逸凡. 7B52-T6叠层铝合金焊接接头组织及疲劳损伤行为. 兵器材料科学与工程. 2021(02): 126-130 . 百度学术
7. 王池权，石亮，张祥春，刘志毅，邵成伟. 焊接缺陷对异种铝合金TIG对接接头疲劳行为的影响. 北京航空航天大学学报. 2021(07): 1505-1514 . 百度学术
8. 韦旭，汪建利，汪洪峰. 5052铝合金搅拌摩擦焊接的组织和力学性能. 兵器材料科学与工程. 2020(04): 77-80 . 百度学术
9. 马青娜，邵飞，白林越，徐倩. 7075铝合金FSW接头腐蚀疲劳性能及断裂特征. 焊接学报. 2020(06): 72-77+101 . 本站查看
10. 杨立恒，刘建军，张建国，陈大兵，李成钢. 浅析母线伸缩节焊接接头质量. 焊接技术. 2020(S1): 156-160 . 百度学术
11. 张铁浩，杨志斌，张志毅，张海军，史春元. MIG焊叠加对6A01-T5铝合金FSW焊接头组织及性能的影响. 焊接学报. 2020(09): 81-88+96+101 . 本站查看
其他类型引用(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 646
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 16
下载:
