高级检索

保温时间对钛合金板翅式换热器真空钎焊过程温度场及残余应力的影响

李悦, 王建峰, 马龙飞, 杜春辉, 胡凤娇, 占小红

李悦, 王建峰, 马龙飞, 杜春辉, 胡凤娇, 占小红. 保温时间对钛合金板翅式换热器真空钎焊过程温度场及残余应力的影响[J]. 焊接学报, 2024, 45(2): 33-40. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20230303001
引用本文: 李悦, 王建峰, 马龙飞, 杜春辉, 胡凤娇, 占小红. 保温时间对钛合金板翅式换热器真空钎焊过程温度场及残余应力的影响[J]. 焊接学报, 2024, 45(2): 33-40. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20230303001
LI Yue, WANG Jianfeng, MA Longfei, DU Chunhui, HU Fengjiao, ZHAN Xiaohong. Effect of holding time on temperature field and residual stress in the vacuum brazing process of titanium alloy plate-fin heat exchangers[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2024, 45(2): 33-40. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20230303001
Citation: LI Yue, WANG Jianfeng, MA Longfei, DU Chunhui, HU Fengjiao, ZHAN Xiaohong. Effect of holding time on temperature field and residual stress in the vacuum brazing process of titanium alloy plate-fin heat exchangers[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2024, 45(2): 33-40. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20230303001

保温时间对钛合金板翅式换热器真空钎焊过程温度场及残余应力的影响

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(2021YFB3401100).
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李悦,博士研究生;主要从事钛合金真空钎焊方面的研究工作;Email: liyue_nuaa@163.com

    通讯作者:

    占小红,博士,教授;Email: xiaohongzhan_nuaa@126.com

  • 中图分类号: TG 454

Effect of holding time on temperature field and residual stress in the vacuum brazing process of titanium alloy plate-fin heat exchangers

  • 摘要:

    钛合金板翅式换热器成品率较低、残余应力较大,该文针对钛合金板翅结构真空钎焊过程开展热−固耦合建模与仿真研究,阐述了钎焊过程温度均匀性及残余应力分布特征,探明保温时间对钛合金板翅式换热器真空钎焊过程温度场及残余应力的影响机理. 结果表明,板翅结构两侧温度较高,中部温度较低,延长保温时间可有效改善板翅结构的温度均匀性. 残余应力均主要集中于翅片上表面与隔板背侧中部,在钎缝及夹持点处存在明显的应力集中现象,保温时间越长翅片钎缝的残余应力越小. 模拟得到钛合金板翅式换热器真空钎焊中残余应力与试验结果相吻合,相对误差为5.3%,验证了该模型的准确性.

    Abstract:

    The power and environmental control systems of high-end equipment, such as aerospace, submarine and aircraft carrier, were commonly in service under extreme environment of high pressure, heavy load, strong vibration and elevated temperature corrosion, which put forward an urgent demand for efficient and high-strength plate-fin heat exchanger. However, due to low production yield, large residual stress and deformation for titanium alloy plate-fin heat exchanger, the corresponding efficient and reliable brazing technology need further breakthrough at present. Therefore, a thermal-solid coupling model was carried out in this paper for the vacuum brazing process of titanium alloy plate-fin structure. The temperature uniformity and the distribution characteristics of residual stress were explained, the influence of holding time on the temperature field and residual stress of the vacuum brazing process of titanium alloy plate-fin heat exchanger was verified. The results showed that the temperature of the plate-fin structure was higher on both sides and lower in the middle. Extending the insulation time could effectively improve the temperature uniformity of the plate-fin structure. The residual stresses were mainly concentrated on the upper surface of the fins and the middle of the back side of the spacer, and there were obvious stress concentrations at the brazing seam and the clamping point. When increasing holding time, the residual stresses decreased. The simulated residual stress during vacuum brazing process agreed with the test results, and the relative errors were 5.3%, verifying the accuracy of the model.

  • 图  1   板翅式换热器结构试验件(mm)

    Figure  1.   Size of plate-fin heat exchangers structure. (a) test piece; (b) geometrical sizes

    图  2   真空钎焊工艺温度曲线

    Figure  2.   Vacuum brazing process temperature curve

    图  3   板翅式换热器结构网格模型

    Figure  3.   Mesh model of a plate-fin heat exchangers. (a) plate-fin structure test piece; (b) position of brazing seam

    图  4   真空钎焊炉中传热模型(mm)

    Figure  4.   Heat transfer model. (a) thermal radiation; (b) cavity radiation

    图  5   热−固耦合模型验证结果

    Figure  5.   Verification results of thermal-solid coupling model

    图  6   不同保温时间的工艺温度曲线

    Figure  6.   Process temperature profiles for different holding times

    图  7   不同保温时间下的钛合金板翅结构真空钎焊温度场分布

    Figure  7.   Temperature field distribution for vacuum brazing of plate-fin heat structures at different holding times

    图  8   不同保温时间下的钛合金板翅结构真空钎焊残余应力分布

    Figure  8.   Residual stress distribution for vacuum brazing of titanium alloy plate-fin structures at different holding times

    图  9   不同保温时间下的钛合金板翅结构真空钎焊局部残余应力分布

    Figure  9.   Local residual stress distribution for vacuum brazing of titanium alloy plate-fin structures at different holding times. (a) 20 min; (b) 25 min; (c) 30 min; (d) 35 min

    图  10   X射线衍射残余应力测试点位置

    Figure  10.   The location of the X-ray diffraction residual stress test points

    图  11   板翅结构下表面残余应力分布

    Figure  11.   Residual stress distribution on the lower surface of plate-fin structure

    表  1   TA1钛合金和Ti-Zr-Cu-Ni钎料的化学成分(质量分数,%)

    Table  1   Chemical composition of TA1 and Ti-Zr-Cu-Ni solder

    材料FeCOHNZrCuNiTi
    TA1钛合金0.0230.0150.070.0010.005余量
    Ti-Zr-Cu-Ni钎料37.51510余量
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   TA1钛合金、Ti-Zr-Cu-Ni钎料物理参数

    Table  2   Physical properties parameters of TA1 titanium alloy, Ti-Zr-Cu-Ni filler metal

    表面辐射率ε密度ρ/(kg·m−3)
    TA1 钎料 TA1 钎料
    0.6 0.5 4500 12210
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   炉壁主要热物理性能参数

    Table  3   Main thermophysical properties parameters of furnace wall

    热导率
    k/(W·m−1·K−1)
    密度
    ρ/(kg·m−3)
    热容
    Cp/(J·kg−1·K−1)
    表面辐射率
    ε
    12.1718000460.60.4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   残余应力测试结果

    Table  4   Results of residual stress tests    MPa

    测试位置横向应力σx纵向应力σy应力σ
    P1−52−181229
    P2−44−208269
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Tan P, Liu X H, Cao B W, et al. Heat exchange mechanism analysis and structural parameter optimization for series-combined microchannel heat sinks[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2023, 187: 108168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108168

    [2]

    Yang Y C, Zou H M, Gu X, et al. Thermal-hydraulic performance of super-amphiphobic louver-fin flat-tube heat exchanger under fouled condition[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2023, 233: 121142. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121142

    [3]

    Wang J, Ling X, Zhang W T, et al. Microstructures and mechanical properties of friction stir welded butt joints of 3003-H112 aluminum alloy to 304 stainless steel used in plate-fin heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2022, 21: 3086 − 3097. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.10.161

    [4]

    Gao S M, Ding J H, Shuo Q, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of additively manufactured shell-lattice copper heat exchanger[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2023, 147: 106976. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106976

    [5]

    Nagatsuka K, Sechi Y, Ma N, et al. Simulation of cracking phenomena during laser brazing of ceramics and cemented carbide[J]. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 2014, 19(8): 682 − 688.

    [6]

    Haider P, Freko P, Acher T, et al. A transient three-dimensional model for thermo-fluid simulation of cryogenic plate-fin heat exchangers[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 180: 115791. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115791

    [7]

    Gungor S. Experimental comparison on energy consumption and heat transfer performance of corrugated H-type and L-type brazed plate heat exchangers[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2023, 144: 106763. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106763

    [8]

    Wan Y, Jiang W C, Dong Z L, et al. Brazing manufacturing technology of plate-fin heat exchanger for solid oxide fuel cells[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(11): 4456 − 4468. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.272

    [9]

    Zendehboudi A, Ye Z L, Hafner A, et al. Heat transfer and pressure drop of supercritical CO2 in brazed plate heat exchangers of the tri-partite gas cooler[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 178: 121641. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121641

    [10]

    Sadeghianjahromi A, Jafari A, Wang C C. Numerical investigation of the effect of chevron angle on thermofluids characteristics of non-mixed and mixed brazed plate heat exchangers with experimental validation[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 184: 122278.

    [11] 罗冲, 张振林, 单际国. 基于VOF模型的铝钎焊板钎料流动成形的数值模拟[J]. 焊接学报, 2018, 39(7): 88 − 92. doi: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390181

    Luo Chong, Zhang Zhenlin, Shan Jiguo. Simulation of filler metal′s flow and shaping during aluminum brazing process of heat exchanger cruciform joint[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2018, 39(7): 88 − 92. doi: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390181

    [12] 黄立进. 铝合金激光焊及激光-GMAW复合焊气孔形成机理与抑制方法研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2020.

    Huang Lijin. Porositu formation mechanism and suppression mechanisms in laser welding and hybrid laser-GMAW welding of aluminum alloy [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2018.

    [13]

    Zhao Y Q, Zhan X H, Chen S, et al. Study on the shear performance and fracture mechanism of T-joints for 2219 aluminum alloy by dual laser-beam bilateral synchronous welding[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2020, 847: 156511. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156511

    [14]

    Gutierrez A, Lippold J C. A proposed mechanism for equiaxed grain formation along the fusion boundary in aluminum-copper-lithium alloys[J]. Welding Journal, 1998, 77(3): 123 − 132.

    [15]

    Lin D C, Wang G X, Srivatsan T S. A mechanism for the formation of equiaxed grains in welds of aluminum-lithium alloy 2090[J]. Materials Science and Engineering, 2003, 351(1-2): 304 − 309. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00858-4

    [16] 刘成财. 铝合金EBW熔池行为及焊缝成形规律的数值模拟研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2018.

    Liu Chengcai. Numerical study on the welding pool behaviour and weld formation regularity during electron beam welding of aluminium alloy[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018.

    [17]

    Yang Z B, Tao W, Li L Q, et al. Numerical simulation of heat transfer and fluid flow during double-sided laser beam welding of T-joints for aluminum aircraft fuselage panels[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2017, 91(1): 120 − 129.

图(11)  /  表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  161
  • HTML全文浏览量:  39
  • PDF下载量:  45
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-03-02
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-10-30
  • 刊出日期:  2024-02-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回