高级检索

海底管道工程临界评估(ECA)参数敏感性分析

姚乾瑜, 邓彩艳, 龚宝明, 王东坡

姚乾瑜, 邓彩艳, 龚宝明, 王东坡. 海底管道工程临界评估(ECA)参数敏感性分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2016, 37(3): 41-44.
引用本文: 姚乾瑜, 邓彩艳, 龚宝明, 王东坡. 海底管道工程临界评估(ECA)参数敏感性分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2016, 37(3): 41-44.
YAO Qianyu, DENG Caiyan, GONG Baoming, WANG Dongpo. The sensitivity analysis of parameters involved in engineering critical assessment for the submarine pipeline[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2016, 37(3): 41-44.
Citation: YAO Qianyu, DENG Caiyan, GONG Baoming, WANG Dongpo. The sensitivity analysis of parameters involved in engineering critical assessment for the submarine pipeline[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2016, 37(3): 41-44.

海底管道工程临界评估(ECA)参数敏感性分析

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51305295)

The sensitivity analysis of parameters involved in engineering critical assessment for the submarine pipeline

  • 摘要: 文中以某海管安装期间的缺陷验收为背景,依据BS7910标准《金属结构缺陷可接受性评价方法指南》,利用Crackwise4.0软件对埋藏裂纹进行了2A级断裂评估,并应用敏感度函数和敏感度因子的方法,分析了断裂韧性、主应力和材料力学性能对极限裂纹尺寸的影响,得到了它们各自的敏感度值.结果表明,在以文中选用的基准参数集为前提下,对于固定裂纹长度,室温下的屈服强度对极限裂纹高度影响最大;随着极限裂纹长度的增加,主应力对极限裂纹高度的敏感性有所增加,而断裂韧性和室温下屈服强度对极限裂纹高度的敏感性相对减小;而室温下抗拉强度对极限裂纹高度不敏感.
    Abstract: Based on the British standard BS7910, the fracture assessment of level 2A was performed using the Crackwise4.0 software for the embedded flaw, which were formed when the submarine pipeline was installed, in the context of defects acceptance. The influence of fracture toughness, primary stress and mechanical properties on the critical crack size was analyzed using sensitive functions and factors, and the values of sensitivity were obtained respectively. Depended on the benchmark set in this paper, for a certain crack length the crack height was most affected by the yield strength at room temperature. As the critical crack length increased, the effect of primary stress on the critical crack height increased and the influence of fracture toughness as well as theyield strength at room temperature decreased relatively. However, the critical crack height was not sensitive to the tensile strength at all.
  • [1] 霍立兴. 海上石油平台缺陷容限的评定[J]. 石油学报, 1990, 11(3):131-135. Huo Lixing. An assessment of acceptance level for defects on offshore structures[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1990, 11(3):131-135.
    [2] 刘明亮, 张玉凤, 霍立兴, 等. 海底管道安全性评定方法的分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2006, 27(8):75-78. Liu Mingliang, Zhang Yufeng, Huo Lixing, et al. Methods of safe assessment for offshore pipeline[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2006, 27(8):75-78.
    [3] 邓彩艳, 张玉凤, 霍立兴, 等. 海底油气管道焊接接头的安全性评定[J]. 焊接学报, 2004, 25(6):27-30. Deng Caiyan, Zhang Yufeng, Huo Lixing, et al. Safe assessment for welded joint of offshore pipeline[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2004, 25(6):27-30.
    [4] 王炳英, 霍立兴, 张玉凤, 等. 基于BS7910含缺陷X80钢焊接管道的安全评定[J]. 机械强度, 2012, 34(4):621-624. Wang Bingying, Huo Lixing, Zhang Yufeng, et al. Safety assessment of X80 steel pipe with flaws based on BS7910[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2012, 34(4):621-624.
    [5] British Standard Institution, BS7910:2005, Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures[S]. 2005.
    [6] 章光,朱维申.参数敏感性分析与试验方法优化[J].岩土力学,1993,14(3):51-57. Zhang Guang, Zhu Weishen.Parameters sensitivity anslysis and optimizing for test programs[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,1993,14(3):51-57.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  762
  • HTML全文浏览量:  16
  • PDF下载量:  426
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-05-21

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回