关于几种求解疲劳寿命置信区间方法的比较

王晓光; 刘新胜; 尹汝琨

关于几种求解疲劳寿命置信区间方法的比较

中南大学土木工程学院, 长沙 410075

计量
- 文章访问数: 366
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 253
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-12-30

Comparison of several methods to solve fatigue life of a confidence interval

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

摘要

摘要: 在给定置信水平下,对疲劳寿命的置信区间进行估计,是应力—寿命关系曲线设计的重要内容. 文中针对疲劳寿命的置信区间问题介绍了数理统计求解方法、MATLAB软件求解法和双侧置信区间三种常用的求解方法,同时采用应力寿命曲线的直线模型和三参数模型,对一组疲劳试验数据进行了置信区间的求解. 分析和比较它们的计算过程和结果. 结果表明,用回归方程对对数寿命置信区间求解时,区间的估计精度会随样本容量增大和对数疲劳寿命分散而提高;对于中长寿命区的置信区间估计,三参数模型优于直线模型,可以用MATLAB软件代替数理统计方法进行置信区间求解.
- 置信区间 /
- 应力寿命曲线 /
- 直线模型 /
- 三参数模型
Abstract: Under the given confidence level, confidence interval estimate of the fatigue life is an important part of the stress-life relational curve design. Aiming at the problem of confidence interval of the fatigue life, this paper introduces three kinds of commonly used solving methods which include the method of mathematical statistics, the MATLAB software solving method and bilateral confidence interval. At the same time, the confidence interval of a group of fatigue test data was solved by using the linear model and three-parameter model of the stress life curve. By analyzing and comparing their calculation processes and results, it's concluded that when solving the logarithmic life confidence interval by the regression equation, the estimation precision of the interval increases with the increase of sample size and the logarithmic fatigue life.For the confidence interval estimate of a middle or long life area, three parameter model is better than the linear model, it's feasible to use MATLAB software solving method instead of the mathematical statistics method to solve the confidence interval.
- confidence interval /
- stress-life relational curve /
- linear model /
- three-parameter model

HTML全文

参考文献(10)

[1]	GBT 24176-2009. 金属材料疲劳试验数据统计方案与分析方法[S]. 中国建筑工业出版社, 2003.
[2]	Yung Li Lee, Jwo Pan. Fatigue testing and analysis theory and practice[M]. 张然治, 译. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2011.
[3]	高镇同. 疲劳应用统计学[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1986.
[4]	丁彦闯, 赵文忠. 焊接结构抗疲劳优化设计方法及应用[J]. 焊接学报, 2008, 29(6): 29-32. Ding Yanchuang, Zhao Wenzhong. Fatigue analysis of welded joints by method of structural stress[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2008, 29(6): 29-32.
[5]	赵永翔. 有限数据下结构疲劳可靠性设计曲线的统计模型[J].核动力工程,2002,23(3): 46-49. Zhao Yongxiang. Statistical model for determining the structural fatigue reliability design curve under limited data[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2002, 23(3): 46-49.
[6]	吴言高, 李午申, 邹宏军, 等. 焊接数值模拟技术发展现状[J]. 焊接学报, 2002, 23(3): 89-92. Wu Yangao, Li wushen, Zou Hongjun, et al. State of the art of numerical simulation in welding[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2002, 23(3): 89-92.
[7]	Standard Practice for Statistical Analysis of Linear or Linearized Stress-Life (S-N) and Strain-Life (ε-N) Fatigue Data[S]. Philadelphia, ASTM, 2004.
[8]	孙海珍, 刘宝友, 刘响林. 概率论与数理统计[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2003.
[9]	武奇, 邱惠清, 王伟生. 基于结构应力的焊接接头疲劳分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2009, 30(3): 101-105. Wu Qi, Qiu Huiqing, Wang Weisheng. Fatigue analysis of welded joints by method of structural stress[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2009, 30(3): 101-105.
[10]	刘卫国. MATLAB程序设计与应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.