高级检索

A6N01-T5合金FSW和MIG焊接头疲劳裂纹扩展行为的对比

戴启雷, 孟立春, 梁志芳, 吴建军, 史清宇

戴启雷, 孟立春, 梁志芳, 吴建军, 史清宇. A6N01-T5合金FSW和MIG焊接头疲劳裂纹扩展行为的对比[J]. 焊接学报, 2015, 36(9): 9-12,38.
引用本文: 戴启雷, 孟立春, 梁志芳, 吴建军, 史清宇. A6N01-T5合金FSW和MIG焊接头疲劳裂纹扩展行为的对比[J]. 焊接学报, 2015, 36(9): 9-12,38.
shu
DAI Qilei, MENG Lichun, LIANG Zhifang, WU Jianjun, SHI Qingyu. Comparison of fatigue crack propagation behavior of friction stir welded and metal inert-gas welded A6N01 joints[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2015, 36(9): 9-12,38.
Citation: DAI Qilei, MENG Lichun, LIANG Zhifang, WU Jianjun, SHI Qingyu. Comparison of fatigue crack propagation behavior of friction stir welded and metal inert-gas welded A6N01 joints[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2015, 36(9): 9-12,38.
shu

A6N01-T5合金FSW和MIG焊接头疲劳裂纹扩展行为的对比

  • 1.

    清华大学 机械工程系先进成形制造教育部重点实验室, 北京 100084

  • 2.

    南车青岛四方机车车辆股份有限公司, 青岛 266000

  • 3.

    清华大学 基础工业训练中心, 北京 100084

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51375259)

Comparison of fatigue crack propagation behavior of friction stir welded and metal inert-gas welded A6N01 joints

  • 1.

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

  • 2.

    CSR Sifang Locomotive and Rolling Stock. Co. Lt., Qingdao 266000, China

  • 3.

    Fundamental Industrial Training Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 研究了6N01-T5铝合金搅拌摩擦焊(FSW)和氩弧焊(MIG)接头不同部位的疲劳裂纹扩展性能, 并对疲劳断口和接头组织进行了分析. 结果表明,对于FSW和MIG焊接头, 其裂纹扩展速率从高到低的部位依次为焊缝(核)区、热影响区和母材. 裂纹在FSW和MIG焊接头相同区域的扩展速率无明显差别, 然而裂纹在FSW接头细晶组织中开始扩展所需的门槛值ΔK要比对应的MIG焊接头高, 总体上其裂纹在FSW焊核区的抗疲劳裂纹扩展性能要优于对应的MIG焊缝区. 裂纹在FSW和MIG焊接头焊核(缝)区扩展的疲劳断口表现为脆性断裂, 而在热影响区则以规则和光滑的疲劳条纹形式扩展.
    Abstract: Fatigue crack propagation (FCP) behavior at different locations of friction stir welded (FSW) and metal inert-gas welded (MIG) A6N01 joints were studied. The fatigue fractures and microstructures of the joints were analyzed. For FSW and MIG joints, the fatigue crack propagation rate (FCPR) in nugget (weld) zone was the highest, while the FCPR in heat-affected zone (HAZ) was lower than that in the nugget (weld) zone. The base metal had the highest fatigue crack propagation resistance. The FCPR had no significant difference when crack propagated in the same regions of FSW and MIG joints. However, the fatigue crack growth threshold (ΔKth) of crack propagating in the nugget zone of FSW joint was higher than that of MIG joint, in other words, the resistance to fatigue crack propagation in the nugget zone of FSW joint was superior to that of MIG joint. The fracture surface of fatigue crack propagating in the nugget (weld) zone of FSW and MIG joints revealed brittle fracture, while that in heat-affected zone was mainly plastic fatigue striation.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(12)
  • [1] Troeger L P, Starke Jr E A. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of a superplastic 6××× aluminum alloy[J]. Material Science and Engineering A, 2000, 277: 102-113.
    [2] Ericsson M, Sandstrom R. Influence of welding speed on the fatigue of friction stir welds,and comparison with MIG and TIG[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2003, 25: 1379-1387.
    [3] Su J Q, Nelson T W, Mishra R, et al. Microstructural investigation of friction stir welded 7050-T651 aluminium[J]. Acta Materialia, 2003, 51: 713-729.
    [4] Seidel T U, Reynolds A P. Visualization of the material flow in AA2195 friction stirwelds using a marker insert technique[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2001, 32: 2879-2884.
    [5] 杨新岐, 栾国红, 许海生, 等. 铝合金搅拌摩擦与MIG焊接接头疲劳性能对比实验[J]. 焊接学报, 2006, 27(4): 1-4. Yang Xinqi, Luan Guohong, Xu Haisheng, et al. Experimental comparision of fatigue properties for 5A06 aluminium alloy friction stir and metal inert-gas welded joints[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2006, 27(4): 1-4.
    [6] Moreira P M G P, deFigueiredo M A V, de Castro P M S T. Fatigue behavior of FSW and MIG weldments for two aluminum alloys[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2007, 48: 169-177.
    [7] 杨新岐, 吴 铁, 张家龙, 等. 厚板铝合金FSW和MIG焊接接头疲劳性能[J]. 焊接学报, 2012, 33(5): 5-8. Yang Xinqi, Wu Tie, Zhang Jialong, et al. Fatigue properties for FSW and MIG welded joints of thickness plate aluminum alloy[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2012, 33(5): 5-8.
    [8] 王快社, 张小龙, 王训宏, 等. 搅拌摩擦与氢弧焊铝合金接头疲劳性能的比较[J]. 材料研究学报, 2009, 23(1): 74-76. Wang Kuaishe, Zhang Xiaolong, Wang Xunhong, et al. Comparison of fatigue properties between friction stir welds and TIG welds for Al alloy[J]. China Journal of Materials Research, 2009, 23(1): 74-76.
    [9] 王希靖, 李树伟, 牛 勇, 等. A7075 搅拌摩擦焊疲劳裂纹扩展速率试验分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2008, 29(9): 5-7. Wang Xijing, Li Shuwei, Niu Yong, et al. Fatigue crack growth rate of A7075 FSW[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2008, 29(9): 5-7.
    [10] Dai Q L, Liang Z F, Chen G Q, et al. Explore the mechanism of high fatigue crack propagation rate in fine microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum alloy[J]. Material Science and Engineering A, 2013, 580: 184-190.
    [11] Hanlon T, Kwon Y N, Suresh S. Grain size effects on the fatigue response of nanocrystalline metals[J]. Scripta. Materialia, 2003, 49: 675-680.
    [12] Lefebvre F, Sinclair I. Micromechanical aspects of fatigue in a MIG welded aluminium airframe alloy: Part 2. Short fatigue crack behaviour[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2005, 407: 265-272.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献(5)

  • 期刊类型引用(3)

    1. 张欣盟，高士康，李高辉，张海峰，周利，王苹. 6005A-T6铝合金双轴肩搅拌摩擦焊接头疲劳性能分析. 焊接学报. 2023(09): 30-36+130-131 . 本站查看
    2. 米鹏，王瑞杰，杨庆鹤. 5083铝合金带吻接FSW接头疲劳强度分析. 机械科学与技术. 2021(03): 463-469 . 百度学术
    3. 邓运来，邓舒浩，叶凌英，林森，孙琳，吉华. 焊后热处理对AA7204-T4铝合金搅拌摩擦焊接头组织与力学性能的影响. 材料工程. 2020(04): 131-138 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(2)

    • 资源附件(0)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  383
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
  • PDF下载量:  233
  • 被引次数: 5
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-01-14

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(12)
    相关文章
    施引文献(5)
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    网站版权 © 焊接杂志社焊接学报编辑部电话：0451-86323218地址：哈尔滨市松北区创新路2077号

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发  百度统计