高级检索
杨海军, 张延松, 来新民, 张小云. 双相钢点焊熔核界面撕裂失效模式评价[J]. 焊接学报, 2011, (2): 61-64.
引用本文: 杨海军, 张延松, 来新民, 张小云. 双相钢点焊熔核界面撕裂失效模式评价[J]. 焊接学报, 2011, (2): 61-64.
YANG Haijun, ZHANG Yansong, LAI Xinmin, ZHANG Xiaoyun. Evaluation on interfacial fracture mode of resistance spot weld dual-phase steels[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2011, (2): 61-64.
Citation: YANG Haijun, ZHANG Yansong, LAI Xinmin, ZHANG Xiaoyun. Evaluation on interfacial fracture mode of resistance spot weld dual-phase steels[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2011, (2): 61-64.

双相钢点焊熔核界面撕裂失效模式评价

Evaluation on interfacial fracture mode of resistance spot weld dual-phase steels

  • 摘要: 双相钢点焊熔核中大量的相变马氏体,导致熔核脆性增加,其界面撕裂问题严重降低了焊点的力学性能,导致接头质量下降.采用传统的评价标准会产生焊点界面撕裂问题.针对双相钢焊点界面撕裂评价问题,建立了基于焊点宏观形貌与微观特征的双相钢焊点失效模式评价模型,获得了双相钢焊点界面撕裂的临界熔核直径评价标准,最后在1.4,1.8 mm厚DP600钢板上通过试验验证.结果表明,临界熔核直径评价标准克服了传统经验公式及现有评价标准考虑因素不全的缺点,成功地实现了双相钢焊点失效模式的准确评价.

     

    Abstract: The interfacial fracture mode of dual phase steel(DP) weld greatly affects its mechanical performance and decreases its weld quality because much martensite in the nugget makes the welds brittle,but the traditional nugget diameter criteria is not suitable to estimate the quality of DP weld,and so this paper builds a mathematical mode based on macro-appearance and micro-mechanism to evaluate the different fracture modes of DP weld.Experimental results show that the model is effective on 1.4 mm and 1.8 mm DP600 welds and is also better than other evaluation criteria for their limited factors considered.

     

/

返回文章
返回