高级检索

AH36钢焊接接头动态应力应变特性分析

刘伟, 朱永梅, 孙傲

刘伟, 朱永梅, 孙傲. AH36钢焊接接头动态应力应变特性分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2024, 45(7): 50-58. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20230712001
引用本文: 刘伟, 朱永梅, 孙傲. AH36钢焊接接头动态应力应变特性分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2024, 45(7): 50-58. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20230712001
LIU Wei, ZHU Yongmei, SUN Ao. Analysis of dynamic stress-strain characteristics of AH36 steel welded joint[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2024, 45(7): 50-58. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20230712001
Citation: LIU Wei, ZHU Yongmei, SUN Ao. Analysis of dynamic stress-strain characteristics of AH36 steel welded joint[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2024, 45(7): 50-58. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20230712001

AH36钢焊接接头动态应力应变特性分析

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金面上项目(52271277); 江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20211343); 海洋工程国家重点实验室(上海交通大学)(GKZD010081); 江苏省研究生实践创新计划(SJCX_2150)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘伟,硕士;主要研究方向为焊接残余应力特性研究;Email: liu9798x@163.com

    通讯作者:

    朱永梅,硕士,教授;Email: zymtt@163.com.

  • 中图分类号: TG 404

Analysis of dynamic stress-strain characteristics of AH36 steel welded joint

  • 摘要:

    基于热弹塑性法研究了160°对接AH36钢焊接接头动态应力应变过程,同时制作试样,利用三维全场应变测量分析系统记录焊接应变的动态变化,验证了焊接有限元结果的准确性. 分析了预热温度和焊接速度对动态应力应变的影响. 研究结果表明,随着预热温度的增加,焊接变形逐渐减小. 预热温度为200 ℃时的平均焊接变形量比未预热时的平均焊接变形量降低了34.6%,同时改善了焊接应力场的分布情况,增加焊缝及热影响区的压应力分布区域,但应力幅值对预热温度的改变不敏感. 焊接变形随焊接速度增大而增大,当焊接速度大于5 mm/s时,增长趋势逐渐平缓,焊接变形场等势分布面积减小. 随着焊接速度的增加,焊接压应力场分布区域减小,焊接拉应力场分布区域增大,焊接速度的改变还会造成平板厚度方向中间层厚度处的应力出现波动.

    Abstract:

    Based on the thermal elastic-plastic method, the dynamic stress-strain deformation process of AH36 steel welded joint with 160° butt joint was studied. At the same time, the sample was made, and the dynamic change of welding strain was recorded by three-dimensional full-field strain measurement and analysis system, which verified the accuracy of welding finite element results. The effects of preheating temperature and welding velocity on dynamic stress and strain were analyzed. The results show that with the increase of preheating temperature, the welding deformation decreases gradually. When the preheating temperature is 200 ℃, the average welding deformation is reduced by 34.6% compared with the average welding deformation without preheating. At the same time, the distribution of welding stress field is improved, and the compressive stress distribution area of weld and heat affected zone is increased, but the stress amplitude is not sensitive to the change of preheating temperature. The welding deformation increases with the increase of welding velocity. When the welding velocity is greater than 5 mm/s, the growth trend gradually slows down, and the equipotential distribution area of the welding deformation field decreases. With the increase of welding velocity, the distribution area of welding compressive stress field decreases, and the distribution area of welding tensile stress field increases. The change of welding velocity will also cause the stress of middle layer thickness to fluctuate.

  • 图  1   焊接试样(mm)

    Figure  1.   Welding specimen. (a) size of welding specimen; (b) specimen marking

    图  2   有限元模型和边界条件(mm)

    Figure  2.   Finite element model and constraint conditions

    图  3   焊缝横截面温度循环曲线

    Figure  3.   Temperature cycling curve of weld cross-section

    图  4   熔合线对比

    Figure  4.   Fusion line comparison. (a) test fusion line; (b) FE fusion line

    图  5   DIC与有限元结果对比

    Figure  5.   Comparison of contour of displacement field between DIC and FE

    图  6   厚度方向位移曲线

    Figure  6.   Displacement curves in thickness direction. (a) displacement curves; (b) fluctuation curves

    图  7   有限元测量点

    Figure  7.   Finite element measured points

    图  8   不同预热温度下的位移曲线和云图

    Figure  8.   Displacement curve and contour in different preheat temperatures. (a) Displacement curve; (b) Contour of displacement field

    图  9   不同预热温度下的应力曲线和云图

    Figure  9.   Stress curve and contour in different preheat temperatures. (a) Stress curve; (b) Contour of stress field distribution

    图  10   不同焊接速度下的位移曲线

    Figure  10.   Displacement curve in different welding velocities. (a) 2 mm/s; (b) 5 mm/s; (c) 10 mm/s

    图  11   不同焊接速度下的位移场云图

    Figure  11.   Contour of displacement field distribution in different welding velocities

    图  12   不同焊接速度下的应力曲线

    Figure  12.   Stress curve in different welding velocities. (a) welding velocity 2 mm/s; (b) welding velocity 5 mm/s; (c) welding velocity 10 mm/s

    图  13   不同焊接速度下的应力场分布云图

    Figure  13.   Contour of stress field distribution in different welding velocities. (a) welding velocity 2 mm/s; (b) welding velocity 5 mm/s; (c) welding velocity 10 mm/s

    图  14   不同焊接速度下的温度场对比

    Figure  14.   Comparison of temperature contour in different welding velocities. (a) welding velocity 2 mm/s; (b) welding velocity 5 mm/s; (c) welding velocity 10 mm/s

    表  1   焊接参数

    Table  1   Welding parameters

    焊缝深度
    h / mm
    电压
    V / V
    电流
    I / A
    焊接速度
    v / (mm·s−1)
    热输入
    q / (J·mm−1)
    318805230.4
    3211105369.6
    3.5231305478.4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   AH36钢的高温属性

    Table  2   High temperature properties of AH36 steel

    温度
    T / ℃
    热膨胀系数
    α / (10−5·K−1)
    屈服强度
    ReL / MPa
    弹性模量
    E / GPa
    泊松比
    μ
    密度
    ρ / (g·cm−3)
    比热
    C / (J·kg−1·K−1)
    导热系数
    λ / (W·m−1·K−1)
    201.672652000.297.8046515.0
    1001.702371900.307.7950015.1
    3001.831701680.317.7551218.0
    5001.951421570.327.6554620.4
    7002.001221510.337.5758922.9
    9002.02681200.337.5061525.5
    11002.0336760.337.4764729.5
    13002.1017200.347.3569733.0
    15002.138100.397.3370432.0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   不同预热温度下各节点的位移

    Table  3   Displacement of points under different preheat temperatures

    节点20 ℃90 ℃150 ℃200 ℃
    位移峰值
    Umax / mm
    最终位移
    U / mm
    位移峰值
    Umax / mm
    最终位移
    U / mm
    位移峰值
    Umax / mm
    最终位移
    U / mm
    位移峰值
    Umax / mm
    最终位移
    U / mm
    1−0.475−0.690 −0.438−0.651 −0.386−0.600 −0.262−0.486
    2−0.432−0.650−0.391−0.608−0.336−0.554−0.211−0.439
    3−0.405−0.624−0.361−0.579−0.305−0.524−0.179−0.408
    4−0.378−0.597−0.332−0.550−0.274−0.493−0.149−0.376
    5−0.354−0.572−0.305−0.522−0.258−0.464−0.116−0.348
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   不同预热温度下各节点的应力

    Table  4   Stress of points under different preheat temperatures

    节点20 ℃90 ℃
    最大应力
    σmax / MPa
    最终应力
    σ / MPa
    最大应力
    σmax / MPa
    最终应力
    σ / MPa
    1 −24.01 8.01 −27.39 9.11
    2 −107.29 −11.93 −108.46 −6.98
    3 −77.97 65.77 −87.05 68.99
    4 86.66 75.19 87.91 85.44
    5 32.89 −20.70 −31.42 −22.27
    节点 150 ℃ 200 ℃
    最大应力
    σmax / MPa
    最终应力
    σ / MPa
    最大应力
    σmax / MPa
    最终应力
    σ / MPa
    1 −26.41 9.59 −26.03 10.17
    2 −106.42 −6.45 −106.57 −2.44
    3 −90.92 71.39 76.84 76.84
    4 90.37 85.31 87.43 77.99
    5 −27.60 −25.62 −29.57 −25.71
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5   不同焊接速度下各节点的位移

    Table  5   Displacement of points under different welding velocities


    2 mm/s5 mm/s10 mm/s
    位移峰值
    Umax / mm
    最终位移
    U / mm
    位移峰值
    Umax / mm
    最终位移
    U / mm
    位移峰值
    Umax / mm
    最终位移
    U / mm
    10.087−0.423−0.438−0.651−0.509−0.643
    20.177−0.352−0.391−0.608−0.488−0.618
    30.223−0.317−0.361−0.579−0.473−0.599
    40.268−0.283−0.332−0.550−0.456−0.579
    50.314−0.247−0.305−0.522−0.442−0.560
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6   不同焊接速度下各节点的应力

    Table  6   Stress of points under different welding velocities


    2 mm/s 5 mm/s 10 mm/s
    最大应力
    σmax / MPa
    最终应力
    σ / MPa
    最大应力
    σmax / MPa
    最终应力
    σ / MPa
    最大应力
    σmax / MPa
    最终应力
    σ / MPa
    1−21.941.94 −27.399.11 11.77−9.07
    270.794.78−108.46−6.9838.15−12.05
    3103.437.11−87.0568.9956.86−9.64
    463.133.7147.9985.4449.6810.67
    519.73−8.4227.44−22.2735.22−6.84
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 段斌, 马德志. 现代焊接工程手册(基础卷)[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2016.

    Duan Bin, Ma Dezhi. Modern welding engineering handbook (basic) [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2016.

    [2] 陈祝年, 陈茂爱. 焊接工程师手册(第三版)[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2019.

    Chen Zhunian, Chen Maoai. Handbook for welding engineer [M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2019.

    [3]

    Ghafouri M, Ahola A, Ahn J, et al. Numerical and experimental investigations on the welding residual stresses and distortions of the short fillet welds in high strength steel plates[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 260: 114269. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114269

    [4]

    Barsoum Z, Barsoum I. Residual stress effects on fatigue life of welded structures using LEFM[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2009, 16(1): 449 − 467. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.06.017

    [5]

    Cui C, Zhang Q, Bao Y, et al. Fatigue life evaluation of welded joints in steel bridge considering residual stress[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 153: 509 − 518. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.11.003

    [6]

    Jiang W, Xie X, Wang T, et al. Fatigue life prediction of 316L stainless steel weld joint including the role of residual stress and its evolution: Experimental and modelling[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2021, 143: 105997. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105997

    [7]

    Shajan N, Kumar R, Manik R, et al. Role of residual stress in the failure of HF-ERW welded tubes[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2024, 161: 108342. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108342

    [8]

    Ghafouri M, Ahola A, Ahn J, et al. Welding-induced stresses and distortion in high-strength steel T-joints: Numerical and experimental study[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2022, 189: 107088. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.107088

    [9]

    Keränen L, Pylvänäinen M, Kaijalainen A, et al. Residual stresses of MAG-welded ultrahigh-strength steel rectangular hollow sections[J]. Engineering Structures, 2024, 305: 117719. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117719

    [10] 朴东光, 潘乾刚, 储继君. 气焊、焊条电弧焊、气体保护焊和高能束焊的推荐坡口[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2008.

    Piao Dongguang, Pan Qiangang, Chu Jijun. Recommended joint preparation for gas welding, manual metal arc welding, gas-shield arc welding and beam welding[s]. Beijing: China Quality Inspection Press, 2008.

    [11]

    Zhu Z K, Han Y, Zhang Z, et al. Numerical simulation of residual stress and deformation for submerged arc welding of Q690D high strength low alloy steel thick plate[J]. China Welding, 2021, 30(3): 49 − 58.

    [12] 金希红, 曾燕军, 刘恒, 等. 不同残余应力测试方法与数值模拟对比研究[J]. 焊接技术, 2022, 51(1): 24 − 27,113-114.

    Jin Xihong, Zeng Yanjun, Liu Heng, et al. Comparative study of different residual stress testing methods and numerical simulation[J]. Welding Technology, 2022, 51(1): 24 − 27,113-114.

    [13] 乔瑞林, 龙伟民, 秦建, 等. YG8/GH4169异种材料钎焊接头残余应力的数值模拟[J]. 焊接学报, 2024, 45(3): 68 − 74.

    Qiao Ruilin, Long Weimin, Qin Jian, et al. Numerical simulation of residual stress in YG8/GH4169 dissimilar material brazed joints[J]. Transaction of the China Welding Institution, 2024, 45(3): 68 − 74.

    [14]

    Pavan A R, Arivazhagan B, Vasudevan M, et al. Numerical simulation and validation of residual stresses and distortion in type 316L(N) stainless steel weld joints fabricated by advanced welding techniques[J]. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2022, 39: 294 − 307. doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.08.010

    [15]

    Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M. A new finite element model for welding heat sources[J]. Metallurgical Transactions B, 1984, 15(2): 299 − 305. doi: 10.1007/BF02667333

    [16]

    Wang Y F, Feng G J, Pu X W, et al. Influence of welding sequence on residual stress distribution and deformation in Q345 steel H-section butt-welded joint[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2021, 13: 144 − 153. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.059

    [17] 王阳. 大型复杂船体结构焊接变形分析方法的研究及应用[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2015.

    Wang Yang. Investigation and application on the analysis methods of welding distortion in large-scale and complex marine structures[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2015.

    [18]

    Wang B, Zhou L, Du J G, et al. Analysis of residual stresses in electron beam welding with filler wire of Ti62A alloy[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2023, 23: 985 − 997. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.081

    [19]

    Sun J M, Liu X Z, Tong Y G, et al. A comparative study on welding temperature fields, residual stress distributions and deformations induced by laser beam welding and CO2 gas arc welding[J]. Materials & Design, 2014, 63: 519 − 530.

    [20]

    Ahn J, He E, Chen L, et al. Prediction and measurement of residual stresses and distortions in fibre laser welded Ti-6Al-4V considering phase transformation[J]. Materials & Design, 2017, 115: 441 − 457.

  • 期刊类型引用(3)

    1. 陶旭阳,何建萍,徐磊. 超薄板脉冲微束等离子弧焊熔池振荡频率特征. 轻工机械. 2020(03): 24-27+32 . 百度学术
    2. 陶旭阳,何建萍,徐磊. 基于LabView脉冲微束等离子弧焊熔池振荡信息提取. 智能计算机与应用. 2020(03): 371-374 . 百度学术
    3. 顾玉芬,席保龙,李春凯,石玗,代悦,丁彬. 基于熔池振荡的GTAW熔透实时传感与控制. 电焊机. 2020(12): 5-8+108 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(7)

图(14)  /  表(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  78
  • HTML全文浏览量:  12
  • PDF下载量:  19
  • 被引次数: 10
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-07-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-05-23
  • 刊出日期:  2024-07-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回