高级检索

7N01铝合金十字接头抗疲劳设计

Fatigue design and prediction on cruciform joint of 7N01 aluminum alloy

  • 摘要: 首次针对铝合金十字接头的疲劳失效模式开展研究. 借助有限元分析与疲劳试验相结合的研究手段,首先将传统的热点应力(HSS)与研究中的等效结构应力(equilibrium equivalent traction force/EETS)的应力集中系数对比,证实了EETS分析结果的网格不敏感性. 基于此,深入分析十字接头连续板厚度、接头熔深以及加载跨距对焊趾与焊根处应力的影响,并提出有效结构应力(effective traction force)计算焊根开裂角度. 结果表明,焊趾处等效结构应力不受连续板厚度、加载跨距与熔深的影响,而在焊根处,各个因素影响不一. 疲劳试验与解析预测结果高度一致,承载十字接头焊根开裂角度并非45°. 十字接头的抗疲劳设计需综合考虑接头几何特征与焊接质量,必须满足焊趾处等效结构应力(Ss,toe)高于焊根处等效结构应力(Ss,toe).

     

    Abstract: The fatigue failure mode of aluminum alloy cruciform joint was carried out for the first time. By using the finite element analysis and fatigue test, the stress concentration factor s (SCF) of weld toe based on the traditional hot spot stress (HSS) and the equilibrium equivalent structural stress(EETS) were compared, the latter was mesh-insentive and shows high consistency. Besides, the influence of the Continuous member thickness of the joint, the penetration depth of the joint and the loading span on the EETS at the weld toe and the weld root are analyzed. And the effective traction stress was used to calculate the root cracking angle. It is found that, the equivalent structural stress at the weld toe keeps the constant, while the EETS at weld root changes with different continuous plate, the loading span and the penetration depth. The fatigue test shows that the root cracking angle is not 45°, which is consistent with the analytical prediction. The fatigue design of the cruciform joint needs to consider both the joint geometry and welding quality, which should meet the equivalent structural stress at the weld toe ( Ss, toe) is higher than the equivalent structural stress (Ss, toe) at the root of the weld.

     

/

返回文章
返回