高级检索

FCBGA器件SnAgCu焊点的热冲击可靠性分析

姜楠, 张亮, 刘志权, 熊明月, 龙伟民

姜楠, 张亮, 刘志权, 熊明月, 龙伟民. FCBGA器件SnAgCu焊点的热冲击可靠性分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2019, 40(9): 39-42. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2019400232
引用本文: 姜楠, 张亮, 刘志权, 熊明月, 龙伟民. FCBGA器件SnAgCu焊点的热冲击可靠性分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2019, 40(9): 39-42. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2019400232
JIANG Nan, ZHANG Liang, LIU Zhiquan, XIONG Mingyue, LONG Weimin. Reliability analysis of thermal shock for SnAgCu solder joints of FCBGA devices[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2019, 40(9): 39-42. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2019400232
Citation: JIANG Nan, ZHANG Liang, LIU Zhiquan, XIONG Mingyue, LONG Weimin. Reliability analysis of thermal shock for SnAgCu solder joints of FCBGA devices[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2019, 40(9): 39-42. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2019400232

FCBGA器件SnAgCu焊点的热冲击可靠性分析

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51475220);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2016M591464);江苏省“六大人才高峰”资助项目(XCL-022);江苏省“青蓝工程”中青年学术带头人计划资助

Reliability analysis of thermal shock for SnAgCu solder joints of FCBGA devices

  • 摘要: 采用有限元法和Garofalo-Arrheninus稳态本构方程,在热冲击条件下对倒装芯片球栅阵列封装(FCBGA)器件SnAgCu焊点的可靠性进行分析. 结果表明,Sn3.9Ag0.6Cu焊点的可靠性相对较高. 通过分析SnAgCu焊点的力学本构行为,发现焊点应力的最大值出现在焊点与芯片接触的阵列拐角处. 随着时间的推移,SnAgCu焊点的应力呈周期性变化. Sn3.9Ag0.6Cu的焊点应力和蠕变最小,Sn3.8Ag0.7Cu焊点应力和蠕变次之,Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu焊点应力和蠕变最大,与实际的FCBGA器件试验结果一致. 基于蠕变应变疲劳寿命预测方程预测三种SnAgCu焊点的疲劳寿命,发现Sn3.9Ag0.6Cu焊点的疲劳寿命比Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu和Sn3.8Ag0.7Cu焊点的疲劳寿命高.
    Abstract: The reliability of SnAgCu solder joint of flip chip ball grid array packaging (FCBGA) device was analyzed by finite element method and Garofalo-Arrheninus steady-state constitutive equation under thermal shock. The results showed that the reliability of Sn3.9Ag0.6Cu solder joints was relatively high. By analyzing the mechanical constitutive behavior of SnAgCu solder joint, the maximum value of solder joint stress was found at the corner of the contact spot between the solder joint and the chip. The stress of SnAgCu solder joint changed periodically over time. The solder joint stress and creep of the solder joint Sn3.9Ag0.6Cu was the smallest, the Sn3.8Ag0.7Cu solder joint second, and the solder joint stress and creep of the Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu solder joint was the largest, which agreed with the actual test results of the FCBGA device. The fatigue life of solder joints was calculated by creep strain fatigue life prediction model. It was found that the fatigue life of Sn3.9Ag0.6Cu solder joint was higher than that of Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu and Sn3.8Ag0.7Cu solder joint.
  • [1] 皋利利,薛松柏,张亮,等. FCBGA元器件焊点可靠性的有限元分析[J].焊接学报, 2008, 29(8):73-76 Gao Lili, Xue Songbai, Zhang Liang, et al. Finite element analysis of solder joint reliability of FCBGA components[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2008, 29(8):73-76
    [2] 张亮,薛松柏,韩宗杰,等. FCBGA器件SnAgCu焊点疲劳寿命预测[J].焊接学报, 2008, 29(7):85-88 Zhang Liang, Xue Songbai, Han Zongjie, et al. FCBGA device SnAgCu solder joint fatigue life prediction[J]. Transactions of The China Welding Institution, 2008, 29(7):85-88
    [3] 田茹玉,王晨曦,田艳红,等.极限温度下CBGA焊点热冲击疲劳寿命预测[J].焊接学报, 2017, 38(10):93-97 Tian Ruyu, Wang Chenxi, Tian Yanhong, et al. Prediction of thermal shock fatigue life of CBGA solder joints at limit temperature[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2017, 38(10):93-97
    [4] 张亮, K N TU,陈信文,等.近十年中国无铅钎料研究进展[J].中国科学:技术科学, 2016, 46(8):767-790 Zhang Liang, K N TU, Chen Xinwen, et al. Research progress of lead-free solders in China in the past decade[J]. China Science:Technical Science, 2016, 46(8):767-790
    [5] 薛松柏,张亮,禹胜林,等.不同尺寸对FCBGA元器件焊点可靠性有限元分析[J].江苏科技大学学报, 2007, 21(6):13-16 Xue Songbai, Zhang Liang, Yu Shenglin, et al. Finite element analysis of solder joint reliability of FCBGA components with different sizes[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, 2007, 21(6):13-16
    [6] 熊明月,张亮,刘志权,等.基于田口法的CSP器件结构优化设计[J].焊接学报, 2018, 39(5):51-54 Xiong Mingyue, Zhang Liang, Liu Zhiquan, et al. Structural optimization design of CSP devices based on Taguchi method[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2018, 39(5):51-54
    [7] 薛松柏,胡永芳,禹胜林. BGA封装器件焊点抗剪强度的试验[J].焊接学报, 2005, 26(10):62-64 Xue Songbai, Hu Yongfang, Yu Shenglin. BGA package device solder joint shear strength test[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2005, 26(10):62-64
    [8] Zhang L, Han J G, Guo Y H, et al. Creep behavior of SnAgCu solders containing nano-Al particles[J]. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics, 2015, 26(6):1-6.
    [9] 张亮,薛松柏,卢方焱,等.不同钎料QFP焊点可靠性影响的有限元分析[J].焊接学报, 2007, 28(10):45-48 Zhang Liang, Xue Songbai, Lu Fangyan, et al. Finite element analysis of reliability of QFP solder joints with different solders[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2007, 28(10):45-48
    [10] Liu B, Wang M X, Lin T H, et al. Finite element stress analysis by packaging process simulation in a stacked chip scale package[J]. Equipment for Electronic Products Manufacturing, 2005, 130:49-54.
    [11] 张亮,韩继光,郭永环,等. WLCSP器件Sn3.9Ag0.6Cu焊点疲劳寿命预测[J].焊接学报, 2012, 33(3):97-100 Zhang Liang, Han Jiguang, Guo Yonghuan, et al. Fatigue life prediction of Sn3.9Ag0.6Cu solder joint of WLCSP device[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2012, 33(3):97-100
    [12] Zhang X W, Cui C Q, Chan K C, et al. Analysis of solder joint reliability in flip packages[J]. lntemational Microelectronics and Packaging Society, 2002, 25(1):147-159.
    [13] Tee T Y, Ng H S, Zhong Z W. Board level solder joint reliability analysis of stacked die mixed flip-chip and wirebond BGA[J]. Micro-electronics Reliability, 2006, 46:2131-2138.
    [14] 孙磊,陈明和,张亮,等. Sn-Ag-Cu钎料焊接显微组织演化和性能研究[J].金属学报, 2017, 53(5):615-621 Sun Lei, Chen Minghe, Zhang Liang, et al. Microstructure evolution and properties of Sn-Ag-Cu solder[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2017, 53(5):615-621
    [15] Zhang Q K, Zhang Z F. In-situ observations on fracture behaviors of Cu-Sn IMC layers induced by deformation of Cu substrates[J]. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2011, 530:452-461.
  • 期刊类型引用(3)

    1. 董曼淑,刘龙,董志波. 重型复杂结构件过渡槽焊接变形工艺研究. 机械制造文摘(焊接分册). 2020(02): 34-39 . 百度学术
    2. 黄炎,李健朋,吴其. 正交异性钢桥面横隔板弧形切口焊接残余应力分析. 焊接学报. 2019(08): 131-137+149+166-167 . 本站查看
    3. 许振波,钱骥. 钢桥U肋-顶板重焊过程残余应力研究. 热加工工艺. 2019(23): 134-139 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  581
  • HTML全文浏览量:  21
  • PDF下载量:  158
  • 被引次数: 5
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-08-22

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回