高级检索

逐层填料建模的多层多道焊残余应力数值分析

巩庆涛1,胡广旭2,苗玉刚1,孟梅1,郑红3

巩庆涛1,胡广旭2,苗玉刚1,孟梅1,郑红3. 逐层填料建模的多层多道焊残余应力数值分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2018, 39(7): 12-16. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390166
引用本文: 巩庆涛1,胡广旭2,苗玉刚1,孟梅1,郑红3. 逐层填料建模的多层多道焊残余应力数值分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2018, 39(7): 12-16. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390166
GONG Qingtao1, HU Guangxu2, MIAO Yugang1, MENG Mei1, ZHENG Hong3. Numerical analysis of multi-pass welding residual stresses based on processes chain simulation[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2018, 39(7): 12-16. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390166
Citation: GONG Qingtao1, HU Guangxu2, MIAO Yugang1, MENG Mei1, ZHENG Hong3. Numerical analysis of multi-pass welding residual stresses based on processes chain simulation[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2018, 39(7): 12-16. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390166

逐层填料建模的多层多道焊残余应力数值分析

基金项目: 国防技术基础项目(KY10100160012)

Numerical analysis of multi-pass welding residual stresses based on processes chain simulation

  • 摘要: 基于连续数值模拟技术,在多层多道焊数值建模时,逐步添加每一层焊缝网格模型,进行分步的模拟计算,实现了有效的多层多道焊接热—力耦合有限元计算.利用连续模拟方法与非连续模拟方法,计算分析了多层多道焊试验模型.结果表明,与非连续模拟方法相比,连续建模方法收敛性好,且纵向残余应力峰值结果较传统建模方法更准确.同时,分析了热—力作用下多层多道焊缝的应力演变历程,揭示了多重热循环作用下焊缝纵向残余应力的变化过程.
    Abstract: Based on processes chain simulation technology, a gradually added filler element method was applied for modeling multi-pass welding and the simulation was achieved step by step with coupled thermal-mechanical finite element method. A research part of multi-pass welding was simulated by both the chain simulation technology and the traditional method. To compare the two simulations, convergence for the chain simulation technology is better and its results of longitudinal residual stresses are more accuracy. Meanwhile, the stress evolution history under the thermal-mechanical activities of multi-pass welding was analyzed, and the principle of longitudinal stresses changing under multi-thermal cycles was revealed.
  • [1] Choa J R, Lee B Y, Moonb Y H, et al. Investigation of residual stress and post weld heat treatment ofmulti-pass welds by finite element method and experiments[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 156:1690-1695
    [2] Elcoate C D, Dennis R J, Bouchard P J, et al. Three dimensional multi-pass repair weld simulations[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2005,82:244-257[DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.08.003]
    [3] Deng D, Murakawa H. Numerical simulation of temperature field and residual stress in multi-pass welds in stainless steel pipe and comparison with experimental measurements[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2006, 37:269-277[DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.07.007]
    [4] Deng D, Murakawa H, Liang W.Numerical and experimental investigations on welding residual stressin multi-pass butt-welded austenitic stainless steel pipe[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2008, 42:234-244[DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.009]
    [5] Ram K, Siegele D. 3D modelling of a multi-pass dissimilar tube welding and post weld heattreatment of nickel based alloy and chromium steel[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2010, 87:643-649[DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.08.010]
    [6] Heinze C, Schwenk C, Rethmeier M. Numerical calculation of residual stress development of multi-pass gasmetal arc welding[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 72:12-19[DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.08.011]
    [7] Suo L, Sendong Ra, Yanbin Z, et al. Numerical investigation of formation mechanism of welding residualstress in P92 steel multi-pass joints[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2017, 244:240-252[DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.033]
    [8] Venkata K A, Truman C E, Wimpory R C, et al. Numerical simulation of a three-pass TIG welding using finite elementmethod with validation from measurements[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2017, 1-12.
    [9] 陈章兰, 熊云峰, 李宗民. 船用低温高强钢三维多层焊接变形有限元模拟[J]. 焊接学报. 2008. 29(8):109-112 Chen Zhanglan, Xiong Yufeng, Li Zongmin. 3D finite element simulation on distortion distribution in multi-layers welding of EH36[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2008. 29(8):109-112.[DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-360X.2008.08.028]
    [10] 孙加民, 邓德安, 叶延洪, 等. 用瞬间热源模拟Q390高强钢厚板多层多道焊T形接头的焊接残余应力[J]. 焊接学报. 2016. 37(7):31-38 Sun Jiamin, Deng Dean, Ye Yanhong, et al. Multi-pass welding residual stresses of Q390 high stress steel's T connection struchure of based on[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2016. 37(7):31-38.
    [11] 胡广旭, 孟梅, 刘冰. 基于后处理再造型的连续制造工艺过程仿真技术[J]. 计算机辅助工程, 2015, 24(2):47-52 Hu Guangxu, Meng Mei, Liu Bing. Simulation technology for continuous manufacturing processbased on post-processing re-modeling[J]. Computer Aided Engineering, 2015, 24(2):47-52
    [12] Afazov S M, Becker A A, Hyde T H. Development of a finite elementdata exchange system for chain simulation of manufacturing processes[J].Advances in Engineering Software, 2012, 47:104-113[DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.12.011]
    [13] 胡广旭. 熔化焊热-力耦合智能数值模拟方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2012.
  • 期刊类型引用(10)

    1. 喻红梅,周红梅,王钰寒,史舒驿茗,胡刘欢,罗元祺,邵甄胰,刘海琼,谭洪涛. 低合金高强钢焊丝熔滴过渡形态及飞溅分析研究. 成都工业学院学报. 2024(03): 10-14 . 百度学术
    2. 杨东青,谢高齐,郭顺,彭勇,王克鸿,黄俊. 排列角度对高氮钢双丝GMAW熔滴过渡行为及成形特性的影响. 机械工程学报. 2024(16): 171-179 . 百度学术
    3. 马立,范霁康,从保强,杨东青,彭勇,王克鸿. 高氮钢超音频脉冲GMA增材制造熔滴过渡特性. 兵工学报. 2024(10): 3686-3695 . 百度学术
    4. 张建,李涛,林红霞,杨东青,方辉,范霁康,王克鸿. 焊丝成分对高氮钢CMT+P焊工艺性的影响. 兵工学报. 2023(03): 792-798 . 百度学术
    5. 王星星,田家豪,李帅,方乃文,何鹏,倪增磊,温国栋. 高氮钢连接技术研究进展. 焊接学报. 2023(09): 118-128+136 . 本站查看
    6. 霍光瑞,薛钢,贺智涛,牛继承. 高强度奥氏体焊丝脉冲GMAW熔滴爆炸现象分析. 焊接学报. 2022(01): 107-112+120 . 本站查看
    7. 杨炙坤,宁凯,钟淳亮,李星燃,刘凤德,张宏. 高氮钢复合焊接焊缝氮含量与接头性能研究. 应用激光. 2022(04): 1-6 . 百度学术
    8. 黄雅馨,孙明辉,乔雷,马青军,韦晨,武鹏博,孙徕博. 节镍型中/高氮奥氏体不锈钢焊接研究进展. 金属加工(热加工). 2022(12): 17-23 . 百度学术
    9. 梁裕,高金良,冯和永,王长顺,刘平礼. 新型高氮不锈钢用绞股焊丝. 新技术新工艺. 2020(04): 12-16 . 百度学术
    10. 明珠,王克鸿,王伟,范成磊,王有祁. 焊丝含氮量及焊接电流对高氮钢焊缝组织和性能影响. 焊接学报. 2019(01): 104-108+165-166 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(9)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  755
  • HTML全文浏览量:  6
  • PDF下载量:  169
  • 被引次数: 19
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-03-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回