T2紫铜-45钢异种材料电子束焊的焊接接头强度与缺陷评定

丁浩1,鲍雨梅1,张锐之1,柴国钟1,杨建国2

doi:10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390119

T2紫铜-45钢异种材料电子束焊的焊接接头强度与缺陷评定

丁浩1,鲍雨梅1,张锐之1,柴国钟1,杨建国2

计量
- 文章访问数: 748
- HTML全文浏览量: 13
- PDF下载量: 2
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-10-11

Study on welding strength and defect assessment of the T2 copper-45 steel dissimilar material

DING Hao1, BAO Yumei1, ZHANG Ruizhi1, CHAI Guozhong1, YANG Jianguo2

摘要

摘要: 焊接接头性能与缺陷一直是焊接领域的重要课题，文中针对T2紫铜-45钢异种材料电子束焊的焊接接头强度和焊接缺陷的问题，首先采用SEM观测焊缝区域的微观形貌，分析其组织构成，并通过标准拉伸和三点弯曲试验，得到接头焊缝区的界面强度参数；其次依据断裂韧性值，开展了针对该异种材料试样内部缺陷的缺陷评定. 结果表明，采用电子束焊加工该异种材料，焊缝内部存在宏观偏析现象. 此外，依据表征得到的T2紫铜/45钢异种材料界面强度参数，验收通过了基于BS7910标准的2A级缺陷评定.
- 异种材料 /
- 焊缝形貌 /
- 焊接接头强度 /
- 界面强度 /
- 缺陷评定
Abstract: The performance and defect of welded joint has always been an important aspect in welding field. Previous researches mainly focus on the influence of brazing solder on welding strength. This project paid attention to the welding strength and defect of the T2 copper-45 steel dissimilar material. It was started with discussing micro-morphology of weld zone by SEM, following up with standard tensile and three-point bending experiments which were applied to obtain interface strength. In accordance with fracture toughness, a defection assessment was performed to provide the basis for enhancing welding joint strength. The results show that macro-segregation exists in the weld zone by using electron beam welding. According to interfacial strength characteristic of T2 copper/45 steel dissimilar materials, 2A level failure assessment based on BS7910 is applied and passed.
- dissimilar material； weld appearance； welding joint strength； interface strength； defect assessment

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1]

Kar J, Roy S K, Roy G G. Effect of beam oscillation on electron beam welding of copper with AISI-304 stainless steel[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2016, 233: 174-185.[2] Zhang B G, Zhao J, Li X P,et al. Effects of filler wire on residual stress in electron beam welded QCr0.8 copper alloy to 304 stainless steel joints[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 80: 261-268.[3] Samal M K, Seidenfuss M, Roos E,et al. Investigation of failure behavior of ferritic-austenitic type of dissimilar steel welded joints[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2011, 18(3): 999-1008.[4] 张新斌, 蒋晓东, 施哲雄. 基于BS7910的含焊接缺陷管道的评定方法[J]. 北京石油化工学院学报, 2005, 13(2): 37-41.Zhang Xinbin, Jiang Xiaodong, Shi Zhexiong. Methods for assessing the acceptability of weld flaws in piping based on BS7910[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Petro-chemical Technology, 2005, 13(2): 37-41.[5] 陈国庆, 张秉刚, 杨勇, 等. SiCp/2024与2219铝合金电子束焊接[J]. 焊接学报, 2015, 36(3): 27-30.Chen Guoqing, Zhang Binggang, Yang Yong,et al. Electron beam welding of SiCp/2024 and 2219 aluminum alloy[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2015, 36(3): 27-30.[6] 张秉刚, 陈国庆, 张春光, 等. 偏束距离对铝合金/钢电子束焊接接头组织与性能的影响[J]. 焊接学报, 2011, 32(7): 1-4.Zhang Binggang, Chen Guoqing, Zhang Chunguang,et al. Effect of beam offset on microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum alloy/steel electron beam welded joints[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2011, 32(7): 1-4.[7] Sharples J, Gill P, Wei L,et al. Revised guidance on residual stresses in BS7910[C]∥ASME 2011 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 2011: 785-789.[8] Lie S T, Yang Z M. BS7910: 2005 failure assessment diagram (FAD) on cracked circular hollow section (CHS) welded joints[J]. Advanced Steel Construction, 2009, 5(4): 406-420.