高级检索

钛合金胶接点焊与电阻点焊接头性能对比分析

张龙,曾凯,何晓聪,孙鑫宇

张龙,曾凯,何晓聪,孙鑫宇. 钛合金胶接点焊与电阻点焊接头性能对比分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2018, 39(1): 55-30. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390013
引用本文: 张龙,曾凯,何晓聪,孙鑫宇. 钛合金胶接点焊与电阻点焊接头性能对比分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2018, 39(1): 55-30. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390013
shu
ZHANG Long, ZENG Kai, HE Xiaocong, SUN Xinyu. Comparison of joint performance between spot weld bonding and resistance spot welding of titanium alloy[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2018, 39(1): 55-30. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390013
Citation: ZHANG Long, ZENG Kai, HE Xiaocong, SUN Xinyu. Comparison of joint performance between spot weld bonding and resistance spot welding of titanium alloy[J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHINA WELDING INSTITUTION, 2018, 39(1): 55-30. DOI: 10.12073/j.hjxb.2018390013
shu

钛合金胶接点焊与电阻点焊接头性能对比分析

Comparison of joint performance between spot weld bonding and resistance spot welding of titanium alloy

摘要

    摘要
  • 摘要: 分别对1.5 mm厚的钛合金板进行胶接点焊和电阻点焊连接,获得了不同焊接电流下的胶接点焊和电阻点焊接头，从熔核的C扫描图像、接头的失效载荷和断口形貌等方面，对比分析了胶接点焊和电阻点焊的接头强度及失效样貌. 结果表明,通过观察A扫描信号的变化与C扫描图像的特征，能够很好的划分接头的热影响区、熔合区、熔核区以及检测出接头的熔核直径和焊接缺陷. 随着焊接电流(7.0～10.0 kA)的逐渐增大，接头熔核直径及失效载荷呈递增趋势；当焊接条件相同时，胶接点焊接头的熔核直径普遍大于电阻点焊接头，但接头的强度相当. 当电流在7.0～8.5 kA时，接头强度不足，熔核区的断口处出现大小不等的韧窝，呈现出韧性断裂特征；当电流为10.0 kA时，接头强度较高，主要呈现出韧性断裂与准解理断裂特征.
    Abstract: The technology of spot weld bonding and resistance spot welding was applied to 1.5 mm titanium alloy sheet. The spot weld bonding and resistance spot welding joints were acquired under different welding current. The joint strength and failure feature between spot weld bonding and resistance spot welding (RSW) were compared by C-scan images of nuggets, the failure load of joints and fracture morphology. Results show that the change A-scan signals and the characteristics of C-scan images can divide heat affected zone, melting area, nugget zone. It can detect nugget diameters and weld defects of joints, too. The nugget diameters of joints increase with the increase of welding current. When the welding process parameters are the same, the nugget diameters of spot weld bonding is generally larger than the nugget diameters of resistance spot welding. But their strength is similar. When the welding current is changed from 7.0 kA to 8.5 kA, there are many different size dimples of the fracture surface, which present ductile fracture. When the welding current is 10.0 kA, the joints are mainly ductile fracture and quasi-cleavage fracture.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(1)
  • [1] He X C, Gu F S, Ball A. A review of numerical analysis of friction stir welding[J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2014, 65(10): 1-66.[2] He X C, A review of finite element analysis of adhesively bonded joints[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2011, 31(4): 248-264.[3] Wei P S, Wu T H . Electrical contact resistance effect on resistance spot welding[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 55(11-12): 3316-3324.[4] Liu J, Xu G C, Gu X P,et al. Ultrasonic c-scan detection for stainless steel spot welds based on signal analysis in frequency domain[J]. ISIJ International, 2014, 54(8): 1876-1882.[5] 孙海洋, 张延松, 来新民, 等. 双相钢胶焊与电阻点焊接头性能对比分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2009, 30(10): 10-21.Sun Haiyang, Zhang Yansong, Lai Xinmin,et al. Comparison of joint performance between weld bonding and resistance spot welding of dual-phase steel[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2009, 30(10): 10-21.[6] 张 越, 何晓聪, 卢 毅, 等. 钛合金压印接头热处理前后静态失效机理分析[J]. 材料导报, 2015, 29(8): 98-101.Zhang Yue, He Xiaocong, Lu Yi,et al. Analysis on static failure mechanism of clinched joints about titanium alloy sheets before and after heat treatments[J]. Materials Review, 2015, 29(8): 98-101.[7] 郭必新, 胡 进. BT20钛合金板材单面点焊工艺研究[J]. 热加工工艺, 2009, 38(9): 104-105.Guo Bixin, Hu Jin. Study on single-side spot welding technology for BT20 titanium alloy sheet[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2009, 38(9): 104-105.[8] Nizamettin K. The influence of welding parameters on the joint strength of resistance spot-welded titanium sheets[J]. Materials and Design, 2007(28): 420-427.[9] 张 勇, 綦秀玲. 工艺参数对TC4钛合金电阻点焊接头组织和性能的影响[J]. 热加工工艺, 2012, 41(7): 155-157.Zhang Yong, Qi Xiuling. Effects of process parameters on microstructure and properties of TC4 titanium alloy resistance spot welded joints[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2012, 41(7): 155-157.[10] 谈芬芳, 谢志雄, 杜 康, 等. AZ31B镁合金与TC4钛合金之间的电阻点焊连接[J]. 热加工工艺, 2013, 42(1): 198-201.Tan Fenfang, Xie Zhixiong, Du Kang,et al. Connection of AZ31B magnesium alloys and TC4 titanium alloy via resistance spot welding[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2013, 42(1): 198-201.[11] Zhang X J,Qiu R F, Zhang K K,et al. Interfacial microstructure and property of resistance spot welding joints of titanium to stainless steel[J]. China Welding, 2013, 22(2): 43-48.[12] 张 龙, 曾 凯, 何晓聪, 等. SUS304不锈钢板点焊接头超声成像及力学性能[J]. 材料工程, 2016, 44(4): 26-31.Zhang Long, Zeng Kai, He Xiaocong,et al. Ultrasonic imaging and mechanical properties of spot welding joint on SUS304 stainless steel[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2016, 44(4): 26-31.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献(2)

  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 赵一帆，王莹，刘瑞涛，孟令坤，宋白钰，赵津，王重阳. Stability analysis of CO_2 gas shielded welding short-circuit transition process based on GMAW dynamic model. China Welding. 2023(04): 55-68 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(1)

    • 资源附件(0)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  631
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 被引次数: 2
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-07-15

目录

摘要
HTML全文
    参考文献(1)
    相关文章
    施引文献(2)
    资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    网站版权 © 焊接杂志社焊接学报编辑部电话：0451-86323218地址：哈尔滨市松北区创新路2077号

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发  百度统计